[newman27]

I never bothered to post this because I find the results somewhat suspect and the Dyno operator never emailed me the completed graphs I asked for but since it applies to this topic...

Last month I took the GT to a Dyno here in Atlanta for three pulls (right after my CAI was installed). They have a Land and Sea brand with front and rear rollers for AWD cars sunk into a cement floor. I believe the operator told me that the Dyno (with installation) cost over $200K (I mention that because I think it indicates we are talking about a very sophisticated unit here). The three pulls showed a high of ~96 bhp with no allowance for drive-train loss (i.e., that field had 0% in it). I know I gave the operator the right bore / stroke / etc. because I called Keith that night to get the numbers specific to my car as the operator keyed them into the PC. This is a roughly 50% increase over the HP measured in 2007 at the Tennessee Dyno Days meet. I know the car is stronger for sure because of some things that have been tweaked and added (like the CAI) but not so sure that number is "right". Just thought I would post now as an example of the variance that can occur between Dynos...