![]() |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
1000 Post Club
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Saginaw, MI
Posts: 1,279
Real Name: Jon
![]() Provided Answers: 2
|
Unanswered: Header on a 2.4
Thanks Jon
__________________
Current 1970 GT; Under Construction Previous 1969 GT; Street/Strip Project 1969 GT; White with Black Interior, Automatic 1969 GT; Black Parts Car 1969 GT; White Parts Car 1970 GT; Silver with Red Interior 1971 GT; Orange with Black Interior, Turbo 1972 GT; Red Parts Car 1972 GT; Blue with Black Interior 1973 GT; Pearl Blue with Black interior. Full body kit. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |
|
Project 1450 supporter...
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Pleasant Valley, CT
Posts: 7,453
Real Name: Bob Legere
![]() ![]() Provided Answers: 20
|
Is it ideal for a 2.4? No, it's likely a restriction in the system if it was designed for a 1.9. But you should have very good torque... Bob |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) | |
|
Detroit,where my home was
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Maria - Hoop, The Netherlands
Posts: 2,217
Real Name: Erick
![]() Provided Answers: 5
|
__________________
Opel Ascona; driving one is like living on the edge. Only built from 1970 - 1975 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Project 1450 supporter...
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Pleasant Valley, CT
Posts: 7,453
Real Name: Bob Legere
![]() ![]() Provided Answers: 20
|
Well, you won't have as much torque as a 2.4 due to the smaller displacement. And the intake manifold from the 1.9 will further reduce that. I don't feel that it would change much compared to using a Sprint exhaust manifold, as the 2.2 head has poorer exhaust flow characteristics in the head already.
The 2.4 has far larger and better flowing exhaust ports, and comes equipped with a much larger original exhaust manifold than the other CIH engines. HTH, Bob |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|