The Classic Opel Forums  

Go Back   The Classic Opel Forums > Performance and Racing > Performance > Engine Swap Forum
Home Opel Groups Calendar Members Map FAQ eBay Search

Engine Swap Forum Discussions on replacement engines

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-11-2008   #1 (permalink)
Opeler
 
Jaakkob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Sweden
Posts: 4
Jaakkob is on a distinguished road
Unanswered: Opel Rekord engine replacement?

hi. I own a opel rekord hardtop 71 automatic.

Im tired of my old, oil spitting 1900 and thinking about replacing it with a 2.2 or 2.4 l. Or maybe a commodore 81, 2.5l 6 piston, if that could fit?

how does that engine fit with the automatic trans? any problems with the flywheel or is it just bolt on?

Have changed a couple of 1900s before, but never on an automatic.

Very thankful for any tips or knowledge on this before i start ripping it apart!

Jakob

Last edited by tekenaar; 08-11-2008 at 07:36 PM.
Jaakkob is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in Technorati
Reply With Quote Top home
Old 08-11-2008   #2 (permalink)
tomking
 
tomking's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: SW Missouri
Posts: 1,287
tomking is on a distinguished road
I am sure some other more knowledgeable than I will speak up. But I think since you have an automatic 1900, that an automatic 2.0 or 2.2 liter will bolt right up.
__________________
TMK
tomking is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in Technorati
Reply With Quote Top home


Old 08-11-2008   #3 (permalink)
Supercharged 2.4
 
Gumby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Oregon
Posts: 619
Gumby is on a distinguished road
Technically speaking just about anything could be made to fit…

The 2.4 is what I am in the process of swapping into my GT. It is a pretty straightforward change as almost everything is bolt in minus the EFI equipment. The automatic tranny should be plenty strong enough for the 2.4. Just try to get the Omega 2.4i engine instead of the later frontera 2.4 otherwise you'll have to swap the flywheel out.
__________________
1972 Opel GT: 2.4, big brakes, efi - inprogress
Gumby is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in Technorati
Reply With Quote Top home


Old 08-11-2008   #4 (permalink)
Detroit,where my home was
 
2 Fast 4 U's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Maria - Hoop, The Netherlands
Posts: 2,216
Real Name: Erick
2 Fast 4 U is on a distinguished road
Provided Answers: 5
Welkom here Jakob
The 6 in line wil fit after you place the radiator more to the front, see if you can find any photo's of a Commodore.

The 4 in line engines are bolt-in.

And we like photo's lots of photo's
__________________
Opel Ascona;
driving one is like living on the edge.




Only built from 1970 - 1975

Last edited by tekenaar; 08-11-2008 at 08:26 PM. Reason: bolt on
2 Fast 4 U is online now  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in Technorati
Reply With Quote Top home


Old 08-11-2008   #5 (permalink)
"The Jägermeister"
 
heimue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Newnan, GA - greater ATL area
Posts: 1,515
heimue is on a distinguished road
Provided Answers: 3
Jakob,

4 cylinder CIHs that will fit: All (1.9, 2.0, 2.2, 2.4, or any other CIH bored out up to 2.7 by any of the known engine tuners). These are bolt-on.
6 cylinder CIHs and DOHCs that will fit: All (2.2, 2.5, 2.8, 3.0, 3.0-24V). For these you need either the Getrag 240 or Getrag 265, or whatever else they came with where you are taking them out (Opel 5-speed gearboxes or automatic transmissions out of Monza, Senator, Omega A). These are close-to-bolt-on. Everything you need is available to buy (use Commodore parts, and parts from the engine donor car).
4 cylinder DOHCs that will fit: 2.0-16V or 2.0-16V turbocharged, with Getrag 240 gearbox out of a Manta B 1.8 or Rekord E 1.8, with some other modifications.

You decide how much you want to spend for having fun, and then decide for yourself.
Enjoy!

Dieter
__________________
One 2.0-16V Opel is not enough

Last edited by tekenaar; 08-11-2008 at 08:25 PM. Reason: spent; your own
heimue is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in Technorati
Reply With Quote Top home


Old 08-12-2008   #6 (permalink)
Opeler
 
Jaakkob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Sweden
Posts: 4
Jaakkob is on a distinguished road
thanks for all the info!

Think i go for a 2.2 or 2.4 CIH. Will see what I can get my hands on.

How about the 2.4 l, is it better to go with the Fuel injection or to fit a 2.2 cylinder head with carburetor? got a 2,2 and a 2.4 L cylinderhead lying in the garage. wanna beat out as much cheap horses as possible

Will post some pictures when i can find my camera

Thanks in advance

Last edited by tekenaar; 08-12-2008 at 02:07 PM.
Jaakkob is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in Technorati
Reply With Quote Top home


Old 08-12-2008   #7 (permalink)
Cunning Linguist
 
tekenaar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Plano, TX 75074
Posts: 4,441
Real Name: Otto
tekenaar will become famous soon enough
Provided Answers: 13
Originally Posted by Jaakkob View Post
thanks for all the info!

Think i go for a 2.2 or 2.4 CIH. Will see what I can get my hands on.

How about the 2.4 l, is it better to go with the Fuel injection or to fit a 2.2 cylinder head with carburetor? got a 2,2 and a 2.4 L cylinderhead lying in the garage. wanna beat out as much cheap horses as possible

Will post some pictures when i can find my camera

Thanks in advance
Intake manifold mounting is identical for the 2.2 and 2.4 heads, so your choice! 2.4 has slightly larger valves, I believe, but Bob says 2.2 flows slightly better "stock" . . . as in, direct from factory.
__________________


1960: '61 Rekord PII 1.7 3S 3.9 '69 Kadett LS 'sprint' 1.9 3A 3.18
1970: '70 GT 1.9 4S 3.44 '72 GT 2.2SSD 5S 3.44 '72 GT 2.4FI 5S 3.44P
'73 GT 1.9FI 4S 3.44 '75 1900 1.9FI 4S 3.44
1980: '85 Bitter SC 3.9FI 5S 3.44P
2000: '09 Solstice GXP Coupe 2.0 SIDI VVT Turbo 5S 3.73P
tekenaar is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in Technorati
Reply With Quote Top home


Old 08-12-2008   #8 (permalink)
Project 1450 supporter...
 
RallyBob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Pleasant Valley, CT
Posts: 7,453
Real Name: Bob Legere
RallyBob has a spectacular aura aboutRallyBob has a spectacular aura about
Provided Answers: 20
Garage
Originally Posted by tekenaar View Post
Intake manifold mounting is identical for the 2.2 and 2.4 heads, so your choice! 2.4 has slightly larger valves, I believe, but Bob says 2.2 flows slightly better "stock" . . . as in, direct from factory.
2.2 and 2.4 heads use identical-sized valves. The 2.2 outflows the 2.4 on the intake side....122 cfm vs. 110 cfm. But the 2.4 outflows the 2.2 on the exhaust side...93 cfm vs. 77 cfm.

I would tend to use the 2.2 head, as they make better torque thanks to the smaller exhaust ports, even on bigger engines. With a split-profile cam favoring exhaust flow (the only Opel CIH head that needs it!), the 2.2 will run very well.
__________________
My Flickr photos.
Jan. 3, 1984 - Jan. 3, 2009, that's 25 years of this damn Opelitis!
C.R.L. 9/22/69 - 12/8/99, J.M.L. 3/3/43 - 6/15/04
RallyBob is offline  
Digg this Post!Add Post to del.icio.usBookmark Post in Technorati
Reply With Quote Top home


Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:24 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.3.0
Clubs, Garage Plus vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.
1998-2009 OpelGT.com - OpelGT .com is not affiliated with General Motors Corp. or it's Adam Opel Division.