![]() |
|
|||||||
| Fuel Injection Mods Modifications and improvements to Opel F.I. systems |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 589
![]() |
Unanswered: VW EFI Control
Thanks, Dave |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Lewiston, Idaho
Posts: 164
![]() |
Short thread hijack
Gary,
What do you think about starting a document that outlines direct conversion/crossover items and the opels they will work with? I realize there is/was a forum to handle this, but I was thinking about a stand alone file that was password protected (to prohibit unauthorized changes) and downloadable. On that note... what do you think about a similar document that could be an addendum to the FSM? Darrin
__________________
Ka mate! Ka ora! |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 (permalink) |
|
Opel Addict Since 73
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Virginia
Posts: 423
![]() |
Sorry
Sorry Dave - Been swamped lately. Here's the note Gary sent me for the mass flow meter:
Hope this helps: '77 Van Bosch 0 280 000 149 022 906 021 S I'll get you the computer part number tonight when I get home. -Scott
__________________
Scott D. |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 (permalink) | |
|
Site Admin
|
I will say this though, there is a power band from ~4,000 to ~5,200 RPM that is impressive. Goes through it in a blink of the eye. That ECU is feeding a hi comp engine with a stock cam in a ported, big valve roller rocker head. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 (permalink) | |
|
Cunning Linguist
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Plano, TX 75074
Posts: 4,441
Real Name: Otto
![]() Provided Answers: 13
|
__________________
1960: ♥ '61 Rekord PII 1.7 3S 3.9 ♥ '69 Kadett LS 'sprint' 1.9 3A 3.18 1970: ♥ '70 GT 1.9 4S 3.44 ♥ '72 GT 2.2SSD 5S 3.44 ♥ '72 GT 2.4FI 5S 3.44P 1980: ♥ '85 Bitter SC 3.9FI 5S 3.44P 2000: ♥ '09 Solstice GXP Coupe 2.0 SIDI VVT Turbo 5S 3.73P |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 (permalink) |
|
Project 1450 supporter...
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Pleasant Valley, CT
Posts: 7,453
Real Name: Bob Legere
![]() ![]() Provided Answers: 20
|
I believe with the stock ECU the power would start to 'lay down' at 4500 or so, since that is the point at which the stock air flow meter stops telling the ECU to add fueling....fuel delivery is linear at that point.
Gary's engine has 9.8:1 compression and decent airflow (102 cfm) from the (1.9H) head, plus a larger exhaust system than stock. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 589
![]() |
Mods
This engine will have the 2.0L valve on a 19H head with the Norris valve springs from Otto's Norris posting of last year with titanium retainers. The pistons are a .050 mm over-sized flat-top 2.0L in an E-block. The cam is a Norris solid lift unit with .451" lift and 282 degrees duration on a 108 degrees lobe separation. The lifters are the Purple Samdog Specials. Will L-Jetronic feed that? I have access to an 2.0L LE-Jetronic unit. Better choice?
Dave |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 (permalink) | |
|
Project 1450 supporter...
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Pleasant Valley, CT
Posts: 7,453
Real Name: Bob Legere
![]() ![]() Provided Answers: 20
|
Tried this (2.0 L-Jetronic) on a 2.4 with a healthy cam, it was choppy at idle (actually sounded tractor-like, as if it had really bad piston slap). It was actually the air flow meter bottoming out.....open/close/open/close. It had nice torque, but by 3800 it started losing power, and by 4500 it started to detonate fiercely...no amount of tuning would compensate, if you made it richer to extend the power to 5000...it would load up the plugs and bog off-idle. You had a trade off at one end of the spectrum or the other. Motronic would work to a certain degree certainly. I really have no experience with the LE-Jetronic, but it's not really all that much more sophisticated than the L-Jetronic. Basically if you start adding big cams you need to consider a programmable ECU. You will be much happier, the engine will make more power, will get better mileage, and it will live long enough to talk about it! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 589
![]() |
2.0L camshaft
Bob,
I can get the specs at .050 and let you know. I also have a new hydraulic lift Opel 2.0E camshaft. Can't remember the specs on it, but Otto put them up somewhere, slightly stronger than the 1.9E I believe. Any thought on that? Dave |
|
|
|
|
|
#15 (permalink) | |
|
Project 1450 supporter...
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Pleasant Valley, CT
Posts: 7,453
Real Name: Bob Legere
![]() ![]() Provided Answers: 20
|
Almost all the stock 1.9/2.0/2.2/2.4 Opel cams are sooo close as far as specs go, there's very little discernable difference. The only OEM cams that are really worth the trouble are the stock solid lifter Opel cam (all pre '71 US Opels and most Euro 1.9's), the slightly hotter Rekord 'Sprint' solid cam (good luck finding one!), and the Kadett GTE cam....which is probably the best stock cam for EFI, hands down. Good idle quality and a few more HP, plus it was designed by Opel for factory EFI. I've done a few custom cams for EFI I'm happy with, the hottest I'd recommend was a .441" lift, 214 @ .050" duration with 112 LSA. The 2.4 that I mentioned before was fitted with a bigger cam still (222 degree intake duration, 218 degree exhaust duration), and even with the larger 2.4 litre displacement it was not happy until I put a carburetor back on it! Basically the bigger the engine the more cam you can give it without ill effects...to a point. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 589
![]() |
Cam Specs
Bob,
These are the specs from the cams that I have: Norris-Intake Valve Lift .451, Duration 282 Intake Opens 31 deg BTDC Closes 71 deg ABDC Exhaust Valve Lift .451 Duration 282 Exhaust Opens 71 deg BBDC Closes 31 deg ATDC Lobe Center Sep. 110 deg. Solid Lifters. Opel-Intake Valve Lift .412, Duration 302 Intake Opens 34 deg BTDC Closes 88 deg ABDC Exhaust Valve lift .412 Duration 302 Exhaust Opens 74 deg BBDC Closes 48 deg ATDC Lobe Center Sep 110 deg. Hydraulic Lifters. Any help? Dave |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 (permalink) |
|
Opel Addict Since 73
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Virginia
Posts: 423
![]() |
Bosch P/N
Dave - Thanks for asking...all is well here. Still recovering from our trip to the RP. The Bosch part number for the VW computer (brain) box is 0 280 000 166.
Just in case it might be useful...the VW P/N is 022 906 021 AG. Hope these are helpful. Good luck. -Scott
__________________
Scott D. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 589
![]() |
Vw Ecu
Scott,
Thanks for the input. Glad that all is well on your return. I am totally confused now. Gary gave me a number that is different from the one that you've offered up. Guess that there are at least two. Gary says that his works well on a modified engine. You have also indicated that the box you have enriches the mixture at idle on a stock engine. This must mean that both boxes up the mixture across the range from idle to full throttle. Much food for thought! Thanks again. Will soon have pictures of the Sport Wagon with fresh paint at Gene's. Best wishes. Dave |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Vancouver Canada
Posts: 415
![]() |
Alternative controller for EFI
I have seen this used on rotary engines with much success:
http://www.bgsoflex.com/megasquirt.html If you really want complete control of your fuel injection, and aren't afraid to really get into it (you have to solder the circuit board together!!!!) jtb |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 (permalink) |
|
Opel Addict Since 73
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Virginia
Posts: 423
![]() |
Mix 'n Match???
Dave - I'm pretty sure the computer I have is from a 76 Bus where Gary's is a 77. Not sure what the difference might be. But here's sumthin else to consider. When I ran the VW computer in my 75 Manta...I didn't change anything but the computer. So the MAF, throttle body, injectors and everything else were original 75 stock Opel components. As I said, you could smell the unburned fuel and hear the rougher idle. I think Gary's setup is using all the bigger VW parts...including the MAF. What happens when you begin to mix and match parts is open to speculation. I have the MAF but never got around to putting it in with the computer. So I'm sorry I haven't had time to do much in the way of tuning and experimentation. Perhaps someday I'll find time. You might want to talk with Charles...he has a reference book for all of Bosch's early L-Jet fuel injection components and their specifications. I know he has it and I was planning to borrow it from him when I got around to finishing my engine and experimenting with different F/I component setups. Good luck.
BTW: Is this for the Rallye? Have you changed your mind? Or is this for the wagon?? Inquiring minds and all that rot...y'know?
__________________
Scott D. |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 (permalink) |
|
Member
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Texas
Posts: 589
![]() |
Components
Hi Scott,
You are probably right. That mix and match is not the best way to go. The increased performance aspect of Gary's engine probably also has some impact. I've got several of the Bosch reference manuals and service guides. I'll take a look at them and see. I have a cross reference for the injection parts and will take a closer look at those. Thanks for your help. Dave |
|
|
|
|
|
#22 (permalink) | |
|
Project 1450 supporter...
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Pleasant Valley, CT
Posts: 7,453
Real Name: Bob Legere
![]() ![]() Provided Answers: 20
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|