![]() |
|
|
#52 (permalink) |
|
Supercharged 2.4
|
I don't think clearance will be any more difficult than with the carb manifold. I have a EFI manifold we can use to test fit and clearances. We are still a ways off before actually making anything but a head count of anyone who is interested would be great.
|
|
|
|
|
1972 Opel GT: 2.4, big brakes, efi - inprogress
|
|
|
#59 (permalink) | |
|
Project 1450 supporter...
|
Levi, I found the sample header flange this weekend, and shipped it out priority mail this morning. Probably see it Friday or so. Bob |
|
|
|
|
|
My Flickr photos.
Jan. 3, 1984 - Jan. 3, 2009, that's 25 years of this damn Opelitis! C.R.L. 9/22/69 - 12/8/99 J.M.L. 3/3/43 - 6/15/04 |
|
|
#60 (permalink) |
|
Supercharged 2.4
|
A little of both I think but he's also a long time friend of mine who is willing to do the work relatively cheap. Pricing was based on the assumption that it would take 12hrs each to complete.
I'm hoping we can get at least a half dozen orders (not including the two I'm having made for myself) to make it worth his time. He'll be making mine first so I can approve of his work before we produce any for the community. I'll keep an eye out for the mail. I've already started drawing the 2.4l exhaust manifold I have on hand. I haven't pulled my 1.9 yet so I haven't compared the two. Is there any difference between the exhaust manifold flange of the raised port heads and the older 1.9 and 2.0 heads? |
|
|
|
|
1972 Opel GT: 2.4, big brakes, efi - inprogress
|
|
|
#61 (permalink) |
|
Southern Red Neck
|
Not meaning to step on toes or whatever, since the cast iron sprint does fit all the Opels (at least the ones we got) can someone possibly look into a tubular type? The cast ones are getting harder to come across in good shape, not to mention taking off in price, but, a good tubular one would not only fit most Opels, but, could also be fitted with either of the two size of mounting flange forr the head pipe. I'm in no hurry for this, but, it would be a great thing to look into for those wanting a sprint, but, are having a time getting one.
|
|
|
|
|
"Yes, I do have a rifle rack in my Sportwagon"
|
|
|
#62 (permalink) | ||
|
Project 1450 supporter...
|
Bob |
||
|
|
|
|
My Flickr photos.
Jan. 3, 1984 - Jan. 3, 2009, that's 25 years of this damn Opelitis! C.R.L. 9/22/69 - 12/8/99 J.M.L. 3/3/43 - 6/15/04 |
|
|
#63 (permalink) | |
|
Project 1450 supporter...
|
And when Gregg's wagon is off my lift I'll start on the N/A Opel GT header prototype. And then Edwin's tube-bender friend can look at the costs to produce that item. Ironically, from my point of view a 'Sprint' replica manifold would be more difficult to produce than a header. Making the severe merges in thick-walled tubing takes a lot of time. With a collector-type header the 4 tubes basically just 'end' or terminate in a formed collector, but in the 'Sprint' manifold, #2 and #3 cylinders need to merge into one before terminating at the flange, as do #1 and #4 cylinder. Bob |
|
|
|
|
|
My Flickr photos.
Jan. 3, 1984 - Jan. 3, 2009, that's 25 years of this damn Opelitis! C.R.L. 9/22/69 - 12/8/99 J.M.L. 3/3/43 - 6/15/04 |
|
|
#64 (permalink) | |||
|
Supercharged 2.4
|
I'm all ears for ideas. While there aren't ready made manifolds for sale yet I can make both the header flange and a replica of the stock header to exhaust system flange. You'd just have to have someone weld the tubes in place and make sure it all came together about the same place as the stock manifold. I've already gotten the 2.4 manifold to exhaust pipe flange modeled and as soon as I pull the manifolds off of my 1.9 I can get that modeled too.
One thing I was concerned about when I looked at the picture of your flange was how close the end bolt holes are to the edge of the material. I think the stock manifold had somewhere around .4" of material in that area but from the pictures I've seen of the previous manifolds there was less than half that much there. Also I've been thinking about the thickness of the flange. Previously they were 3/8" with welded on washers to bring the bolt locations to the correct height but since I'll be making these out of 1/2" it allows more flexability in the thickness of the flange. My preference would be to make them a touch thicker (.4 - .45") to help prevent warping while welding. There is a slight increase in weight but I am not sure that's a large concern given that we aren't making them out of the lightest material to begin with. I'd like to hear your thoughts.
|
|||
|
|
|
|
1972 Opel GT: 2.4, big brakes, efi - inprogress
|
|
|
#65 (permalink) |
|
Member 1000 Post Club
|
Bob and others working or thinking about the flanges,
This thought/question came to mind last year when doing my flange.... I noticed on my purchased header that the flange has a raised ridge where it mates with the metal insert of the gasket. If the flange is flat in this area, will there be any issues with getting to gasket/flange to seal???? Thoughts??? Anyone.... Last edited by Paul; 06-17-2008 at 02:47 PM.. Reason: d |
|
|
|
|
Paul
|
|
|
#66 (permalink) | |
|
Supercharged 2.4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1972 Opel GT: 2.4, big brakes, efi - inprogress
|
|
|
#67 (permalink) | |
|
Southern Red Neck
|
I understand your point, but, you even stated that with a header, there's going to be a bazillion ways that people want it to fit their motor/driving yadd a yadda, but, if there was just the one design, which most want to get i.e. the cast iron sprint,, why not copy it? Just thinking out loud here |
|
|
|
|
|
"Yes, I do have a rifle rack in my Sportwagon"
|
|
|
#68 (permalink) | |
|
Supercharged 2.4
|
Like I said earlier if you are really dead set on something that will bolt up to your stock exhaust system that can be made... via a couple of flanges and some tubular steel. I can make the flanges avaliable for those who want to bolt up to the stock exhaust. If fact we can probably even fab a couple of non-turbo headers that do just that while I still have my stock exhaust system in the car. These would be "one offs" no production and probably be more expensive than just finding a sprint manifold. Last edited by Gumby; 06-17-2008 at 04:36 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
|
1972 Opel GT: 2.4, big brakes, efi - inprogress
|
|
|
#69 (permalink) |
|
Southern Red Neck
|
I'm not "dead set", but, here's my thinking. F.I. obviously is the way to go now, especially since Megasquirt and such are making F.I. adaptable to most any car. I read an article in Hot Rod where some one F.I. their 426 Hemi Charger with an aftermarket F.I. But, in any case, you have to make modifications. Nothing new, but, why not make one part of the "conversion simpler? Most that want to put F.I. on their GT/Manta/Ascona/Kadett would need a sprint type manifold or header to allow room to fit the plenum and such. Why not go a step further and combine a header and the sprint and make it so it'll just bolt up? Right now, one would have to hunt down a sprint and shuck out big $$ or get one of those *ahem* headers you see on Ebay now and then? I'll withhold my comments on "that" header as we all know the story
Anyway, I'm as dumb as a rock when it comes to F.I. and I will be the first to tell anyone that. If you were to lay out all the pieces for an F.I. unit, point a gun to my head and say "make it work", I'd have to say "pull the trigger" The 75 Wagon I have now is the first F.I. Opel I have ever had. Granted it has not given me any trouble, but, if it did, I wouldn't know what to do. But, making this tubular sprint would make it a little easier for future Opelers to covert their cars and enjoy them. I'm in no hurry what so ever, I'd just like to see it done. I even have my own RallyBob flange to start with.
|
|
|