Opel Forums  

Go Back   Opel Forums > Performance and Racing > Performance > Opel Engine Performance Modifications
Home Opel Groups Members Map eBay Search

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-28-2005   #51 (permalink)
Moderator
 
soybean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Reidsville N.C.
Posts: 2,160
Classified Rating: 0% (0)
soybean is on a distinguished road
Originally Posted by jeff denton
The main thing is, you must not have any gasket material hanging over into the combustion chamber.
9-1/2 to 1 compression ratio should make for a nice peppy engine, will need 91 octane gas.
Jeff, that was what I was wondering about, "gasket material hanging over into the combustion chamber." That said, the 1.9 gasket being 2mm under, wouldn't it be prone to fail?

Originally Posted by nobody
, with the 2.0s you will be over 9:1 to start. I think around 9.4. I'd be watching the finished compression with that combination.
Too much compression with 91 octane gas with the 1.9 head? or should I step up to a 2.0l head with the 43mm intake valves and 36mm exhaust valves. I'd also looked at thread http://opelgt.com/forums/showthread....ht=S-10+clutch which discussed some of these questions here.Thanks, Jarrell

Last edited by soybean; 06-28-2005 at 08:48 AM.. Reason: Added link
soybean is offline   Reply With Quote Top home
You lose your dreams, you lose your mind. (The Rolling Stones)
Old 06-28-2005   #52 (permalink)
Senior Contributor
 
markandson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Kent Lakes, NY
Posts: 1,388
Classified Rating: 0% (0)
markandson is on a distinguished road
Well, Git Er Done!, I just took apart a stock 1.9 yesterday and I didn't throw out the old head gasket yet . So here you go.... The crushed piston seal diameter runs between 3.736" (94.894mm) and 3.741" (95.021mm) and the crushed thickness at the piston seal area is .038" (.965mm). HTH
markandson is offline   Reply With Quote Top home
Jeff

'73 GT,5spd,Recaro,EDIS4 2.2 EFI by MegaSquirt,15" Wheels,Lecarra,F&R Sway Bars,Custom Exhaust,1" Sport Spring,Koni Reds,Big Brakes,3 Core Ali Radiator,Hse of Colors Kandy Pagan Gold.

'64 VW Karmann Ghia
'08 BMW M3
Old 06-28-2005   #53 (permalink)
4246 Post Club
 
GTJIM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 5,491
Classified Rating: 0% (0)
GTJIM is on a distinguished road
Unshroud It!

Originally Posted by nobody
Jarrell with the 2.0s you will be over 9:1 to start. I think around 9.4. I'd be watching the finished compression with that combination.
This is a perfect excuse to "unshroud" valves out to the edge of the new bore size as it helps in two ways - better air flow and slightly reduced static compression ratio.
GTJIM is offline   Reply With Quote Top home
GTJim
Opel Owner since last Century!

Copyright © 2000-2008
J D Henry
All Rights Reserved
Old 06-29-2005   #54 (permalink)
Über OpelGT.com Moderator
 
kwilford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 3,720
Classified Rating: 0% (0)
kwilford is on a distinguished road
Originally Posted by soybean
Okay here comes a dumb question. Assuming you use the combo the Keith posted, in item 2 , he has 30 over flat top pistons (93mm). One uses the 2.0 l (95 mm) pistons, do you use the regular gasket set, or go with 2.0 l gasket set since you're over 02mm? or does it matter. Jarrell
Jarrell, I believe that you need to use the 2.0 head gasket for either the 2.0 pistons, or any similar size (such as the "economical" SBC 265, or stroked-crank with the 305 pistons). Call and ask Gil at OGTS, he will say for sure (or Bob or Dave could just chime in) and he also sells them of course. But as I recall, he was out of stock a few months ago...
kwilford is offline   Reply With Quote Top home
Keith Wilford
working on my '71 GT and '75 SportWagon
Old 06-29-2005   #55 (permalink)
OPEL-LESS!!!
 
greensmurf20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Gobles michigan 49055
Posts: 2,110
Classified Rating: 0% (0)
greensmurf20
about a month and a half ago i took the last felpro headgasket he had and said he was just about out of even the "normal" ones.
greensmurf20 is offline   Reply With Quote Top home
previousely owned 8 GTs and 1 manta.

currently own

92 25th anniversary Z28. Ttop, 350, T56 swap, many upgrades, basically a complete restore.

67 chevy sportvan deluxe....next in line.
Old 06-29-2005   #56 (permalink)
4246 Post Club
 
GTJIM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 5,491
Classified Rating: 0% (0)
GTJIM is on a distinguished road
From "Search"

In a previous post Bob mentioned that the standard 1.9 head gasket can be used as the diameter of the holes is 94.8 - 95.0 mm in a compressed gasket.
So it looks like you can sneak by with a 1.9 head gasket on a 95mm - 2.0L bore.

Last edited by GTJIM; 06-29-2005 at 04:54 PM..
GTJIM is offline   Reply With Quote Top home
GTJim
Opel Owner since last Century!

Copyright © 2000-2008
J D Henry
All Rights Reserved
Old 06-29-2005   #57 (permalink)
No Access
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: in transit
Posts: 3,873
Classified Rating: 0% (0)
nobody is on a distinguished road
The problem you get into using a 1.9 gasket on a 2.0 is that the inner edge of the metal to seal the combustion chamber is now in the combustion chamber. A stock head gasket is meant to be between the block and head and is actually above size for a standard bore. 2.0 0r 95mm is just over the working limit of stock so you run the risk of burning up a stock head gasket or piston hitting it if your pushing the compression limits. When I did the 2.0 I had gaskets galore and I found that the chances of one sealing and staying good were pretty slim. Use the right one and save the headache and worry.
nobody is offline   Reply With Quote Top home
Old 07-02-2005   #58 (permalink)
Member
 
azopelnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Yuma Arizona
Posts: 636
Classified Rating: 0% (0)
azopelnut
[quote=RallyBob]When I used to build a lot of 2.0 litre circle track engines, I could get around 10.5-10.7:1 compression with flat-tops if I decked the block .010" and milled the head .085" with flat-tops and Chevy valves (1.85/1.50).
How did you correct the timing with that amount of milling? Did the profile of the cam make up for the milling?
azopelnut is offline   Reply With Quote Top home
Paul "azopelnut" Heebink
1956 Studebaker Power Hawk 259 V8
1970 GT 12A-Rotary 5-speed
1973 (2) GTs, both 1.9 4-speed
1973 Ascona 4-door 1.9 4-speed A/C
1974 Manta, 1.9 Auto A/C
1975 Sportwagon 1.9 FI 4-speed A/C
1975 Fiat X19
Old 07-02-2005   #59 (permalink)
Moderator
 
soybean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Reidsville N.C.
Posts: 2,160
Classified Rating: 0% (0)
soybean is on a distinguished road
[quote=azopelnut]
Originally Posted by RallyBob
When I used to build a lot of 2.0 litre circle track engines, I could get around 10.5-10.7:1 compression with flat-tops if I decked the block .010" and milled the head .085" with flat-tops and Chevy valves (1.85/1.50).
How did you correct the timing with that amount of milling? Did the profile of the cam make up for the milling?
Check out post 42 and a couple of earlier ones that Jeff posted, on how to change the cam timing. HTH, Jarrell
soybean is offline   Reply With Quote Top home
You lose your dreams, you lose your mind. (The Rolling Stones)
Old 07-02-2005   #60 (permalink)
Member
 
azopelnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Yuma Arizona
Posts: 636
Classified Rating: 0% (0)
azopelnut
Right
I didn't think that that much milling could be compensated with the modified cam gear. Like Keith and Rallybob said 2 degrees retard for every .025 milled so if Rallybob milled a combination of .095 then that would be nearly 8 degrees retard and the modified gear would only be 6 advance leaving the engine at 2 degrees retard..right or am I missing something?
azopelnut is offline   Reply With Quote Top home
Paul "azopelnut" Heebink
1956 Studebaker Power Hawk 259 V8
1970 GT 12A-Rotary 5-speed
1973 (2) GTs, both 1.9 4-speed
1973 Ascona 4-door 1.9 4-speed A/C
1974 Manta, 1.9 Auto A/C
1975 Sportwagon 1.9 FI 4-speed A/C
1975 Fiat X19
Old 07-02-2005   #61 (permalink)
Moderator
 
soybean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Reidsville N.C.
Posts: 2,160
Classified Rating: 0% (0)
soybean is on a distinguished road
You are correct. Check out Bobs post 44 near the end, and from what I am able to gather that 2 degrees will give you some good low end torque. HTH, Jarrell
soybean is offline   Reply With Quote Top home
You lose your dreams, you lose your mind. (The Rolling Stones)
Old 07-02-2005   #62 (permalink)
Über OpelGT.com Moderator
 
kwilford's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 3,720
Classified Rating: 0% (0)
kwilford is on a distinguished road
Paul, the "6 degree" fix is just the modified cam gear. The vernier cam gears that Bob describes has much greater adjustment, and much more precise.
kwilford is offline   Reply With Quote Top home
Keith Wilford
working on my '71 GT and '75 SportWagon
Old 07-02-2005   #63 (permalink)
Senior Contributor
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Temple, NH
Posts: 779
Classified Rating: 0% (0)
Travis
Don't be afraid to combine the 6 degree dowel pin trick with the offset bushing and even skipping teeth on the sprocket. You can get any adjustment you want this way.

For example, if you advance the cam one tooth(18 degrees if I remember correctly) and then retard the cam 6 degrees with the extra dowel hole, you'll end up with 12 advanced. You can then use the offset bushing to fine tune in either direction...

-Travis
Travis is offline   Reply With Quote Top home
Old 07-02-2005   #64 (permalink)
Project 1450 supporter...
 
RallyBob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Pleasant Valley, CT
Posts: 6,537
Classified Rating: 0% (0)
RallyBob will become famous soon enough
Originally Posted by azopelnut
Right
I didn't think that that much milling could be compensated with the modified cam gear. Like Keith and Rallybob said 2 degrees retard for every .025 milled so if Rallybob milled a combination of .095 then that would be nearly 8 degrees retard and the modified gear would only be 6 advance leaving the engine at 2 degrees retard..right or am I missing something?
I also often have the cam ground with some advance in it too. So you can not only return the timing to zero but you can gain some cam advance as well.
RallyBob is offline   Reply With Quote Top home
Old 07-03-2005   #65 (permalink)
former opel racer
 
jeff denton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: near some glaciers
Posts: 2,745
Classified Rating: 0% (0)
jeff denton is on a distinguished road
There's way too much worry about all this. This is about doing all the decking and milling you want to get max compression and then just fix the timing problem. Forget timing marks. Degree in your cam according to the spec sheet that came with it and you're done. The nice expensive vernier sprocket is beautiful, the way to go, no doubt, but I'm talking about STOCK parts just kind of "messed with" for ULTIMATE performance. On a budget, may I add... I can drill two little holes in a gear pretty cheap... Was not surprised by Bob's finding that Opel racers had my trick figured out long ago. It's too simple to overlook once you get focused on it, just re-read my post about how I found it and do the experiment yourself. Trace the sprocket on paper, teeth, bolt holes, dowel hole, and all, then rotate it to the next bolt hole. Look at where the teeth land. Rotate it again to the next bolt hole, look at where the teeth landed this time. Do this and you will see the obvious simplicitity of the whole situation! If you are fretting about any of this topic you do not yet understand it, trust me, but keep looking, it will hit you eventually. You could have the cam ground a bazillion degrees off and still fix it this easily, it is all about degreeing in your cam. When do you want the valve to open, make it happen. Skipping the chain a tooth on the sprocket changes timing nine degrees, as I recall from my first attempt at making an angle milled head degree in at all... that's all I did at first, and won a (trophy dash) race even, against 2.3 liter Mustangs

Last edited by jeff denton; 07-03-2005 at 03:49 AM..
jeff denton is offline   Reply With Quote Top home

No Opels were harmed in the filming of this movie.
However two Mustangs, a Pinto, and a Capri were hospitalized.
One Mustang was euthanized the next morning.
Old 12-09-2006   #66 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Ohio for now, but Texas is Home
Posts: 337
Classified Rating: 0% (0)
Logbook Entries: 4
Washout
Guys, I've read this post a couple of times now and still need a little help. I've never had to degree a cam before but this engine I'm building now had been decked and I have no idea how much since there is no published factory height. All that said, I've installed a degree wheel after making a mounting hub out of an old pulley and I built a piston stop for insuring that I have absolute TDC set on the degree wheel. I set the cam using the old timing marks as a starting point and using the .050 reading provided with my ISKY cam spec sheet I started taking readings.
In my case the spec sheet says the intake should be open .050 at 4 degrees Before TDC and closed to .050 at 44 degrees ABDC. My measurements indicated the the cam was opened to .050 at 3 degrees After TDC and closed to .050 at 45 degrees ABDC. How can the ABDC reading be so close to correct (45 actual vs 44 planned) and yet the BTDC reading is off by 7 degrees(BTDC 4 planned vs ATDC 3 actual)? Is this attributable to timing chain stretch? I've only got the rocker arms installed on two cylinders to provide some tension on the cam, is that enough or do I need them all installed for a more accurate reading?
Washout is offline   Reply With Quote Top home
I call her Laticia, Costs more than she's worth, but what a set of headlights!
Old 12-09-2006   #67 (permalink)
Project 1450 supporter...
 
RallyBob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Pleasant Valley, CT
Posts: 6,537
Classified Rating: 0% (0)
RallyBob will become famous soon enough
Originally Posted by Washout View Post
In my case the spec sheet says the intake should be open .050 at 4 degrees Before TDC and closed to .050 at 44 degrees ABDC. My measurements indicated the the cam was opened to .050 at 3 degrees After TDC and closed to .050 at 45 degrees ABDC. How can the ABDC reading be so close to correct (45 actual vs 44 planned) and yet the BTDC reading is off by 7 degrees(BTDC 4 planned vs ATDC 3 actual)?
Quick question... Are you checking with zero valve lash, and at .050" lifter rise?

By my calculations, you are supposed to have a cam with 228* @ .050" and with 110* intake centerline. You are only measuring 222*@ .050" with a 114* intake centerline.

This shows two things:
One, the cam is 4* retarded.
And two, it has 6* less duration than what the cam card says it should have.

This is not entirely uncommon! Some cams are wayyy off from the cam cards, but sometimes it has to do with how you measure it. Some things that can affect it:
Is it truly at zero valve lash?
Is the dial indicator at the center of the lifter?
Is the dial indicator rididly attached, or does it move around?
Is the dial indicator perfectly perpendicular to the lifter?
Does the degree wheel spin when you rotate the engine?
Does the degree wheel pointer move around?
Did your 'positive stop' in fact move during the measuring process?

So it could just be a 'tolerance stack' of any one or all of these things. I am overly cautious when degreeing a cam, I will perform the same check 3-4 times until it's consistently the same, because I've had the same issues in the past!

HTH,
Bob

Last edited by RallyBob; 12-09-2006 at 07:47 PM.. Reason: spelling
RallyBob is offline   Reply With Quote Top home
Old 12-09-2006   #68 (permalink)
Project 1450 supporter...
 
RallyBob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Pleasant Valley, CT
Posts: 6,537
Classified Rating: 0% (0)
RallyBob will become famous soon enough
Originally Posted by Washout View Post
I've never had to degree a cam before but this engine I'm building now had been decked and I have no idea how much since there is no published factory height.
Missed this before.
Factory deck height is A+T mm, this is measured from the top of the block to the crankshaft centerline.

Bob

Last edited by RallyBob; 12-10-2006 at 10:40 AM.. Reason: edited to keep the competition guessing...
RallyBob is offline   Reply With Quote Top home
Old 12-09-2006   #69 (permalink)
Member 1000 Post Club
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Ft Smith, Arkansas
Posts: 1,364
Classified Rating: 0% (0)
Paul
Yea... what Bob said....

On the cams I've bought, I've found the lift and duration to be a little LESS than advertised. When dergeeing the cam, I did not try to get the @ lift numbers to match the cam card. I carefully measured and charted several lifts vs angles. I probably did more than a skilled tuner would have to do to understand the result, but sometimes the more information the better.

First, use Bob's guidelines above and be sure of your set-up. I found my dial indacator was moving slightly due to the tiny vibrations of the process. Next repeat 3 or 4 times, writing down the numbers each time and then check for variation. If you bought a big wheel then by all means record to the half degree.

I measured lifts on the lift side @: .005; .010"; .013", .025; .050"; .100"; .150"; .250 and then on the way back down again at each corresponding lift height.

Then, using the math I calculated Centerline at each lift: .005, .010" etc.

You may find the opening ramps and the closing ramps to NOT be symmetrical causing the C/L to be skewed. On one cam I found the numbers @.050" to be off slightly, so the numbers I took higher help to confirm the @.050 trend.

The numbers are still in a notebook, but it is in my desk at work. If you need, I can scan them in early next week and you can see exactly how I did it down to my calculations.

Last edited by Paul; 12-09-2006 at 08:26 PM.. Reason: created spellin errors for Otto to find... LOL
Paul is offline   Reply With Quote Top home
Paul
Old 12-09-2006   #70 (permalink)
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Ohio for now, but Texas is Home
Posts: 337
Classified Rating: 0% (0)
Logbook Entries: 4
Washout
Bob,
The Piston stop is solid, I made it out of 1/2 inch thick by 1 3/4 wide 6061 aluminum, reamed the bolt holes for close fit and then threaded and installed a 3/8 bolt in the center. The 3/8 bolt is completely threaded into the stop all the way to the bolt head... it's solid, no flex. The Degree wheel is solid as well, I cut the pulley off of an old opel pulley then machined a face on it that the index wheel could fit over. Then I made a washer with a face to pinch the index wheel in place. The pointer on the block is simply a piece of welding rod but it too is solid.
I have the dial indicator directly on the lifter, perpendicular to the lifter (no rocker arm installed) and the magnetic base seems to be very solid. The results I've been getting are very consistant. I just don't quite understand them. You say the cam is 4* retarded, I thought it was 7 degrees retarded since it was suppose to be 4* BTDC and instead its 3* ATDC? The inaccuracy in the grind would explain the second reading though. Thanks for the information.
Washout is offline